Skip to main content

State v. Montague

Citations

  • 14 S.W.3d 867
  • 341 Ark. 144
  • 2000 Ark. LEXIS 189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when the argument of double jeopardy is not raised below, the appellate court cannot consider that argument on direct appeal
  • holding appellant must raise double-jeopardy objection at trial in order to preserve issue for appeal
  • holding appellant must raise double-jeopardy objection at trial in order to preserve issue for appeal
  • explaining that double-jeopardy claims must be raised at trial or in a petition under the Rule
  • explaining that double-jeopardy claims must be raised at trial and are not treated as an issue of subject-matter jurisdiction that can be raised for the first time on direct appeal
  • conviction affirmed and double-jeopardy argument not addressed on appeal where no timely and appropriate objection was made in the trial court; court of appeals reversed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ray Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.