State v. Bordeaux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, even if an issue is explicitly set forth in a brief, “if the issue is only mentioned in passing and not supported by any cogent argument or authority, it cannot be considered” on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
• Florida v. Royer
  Supreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• United States v. Cortez
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
• United States v. Sokolow
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
• Illinois v. Wardlow
  Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
• United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
• Illinois v. Caballes
  Supreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
• State v. Atkinson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1996-04-10· cited 759×
• State v. Valdez-Molina
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 700×
• State v. Schevers
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1999-02-09· cited 680×
• State v. Weaver
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1995-07-25· cited 169×
• State v. Montague
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-06-16· cited 166×
• State v. Sheldon
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2003-12-17· cited 123×
• State v. Parkinson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2000-12-18· cited 116×
• State v. Gutierrez
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2002-07-10· cited 92×
• State v. Schaffer
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1999-06-30· cited 88×
• State v. Thompson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1988-08-02· cited 86×