Court of Appeals of Kansas· 3/15/2002
Stewart v. State
Citations
- 42 P.3d 205
- 30 Kan. App. 2d 380
- 2002 Kan. App. LEXIS 253
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that trial court failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law on all of movant’s arguments and remanding case for compliance with Rule 183[j]
- boilerplate journal entries do not comply with Rule 183[j]; case remanded for compliance
- boilerplate journal entries do not comply with Rule 183(j), case remanded
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pierron, Johnson, Buchele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-02-06· cited 107×
- State v. HogeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-02-09· cited 46×
- Gilkey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-01-03· cited 43×
- Nguyen v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-12-21· cited 28×
- Moll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-04-10· cited 10×
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-06-17· cited 7×
- Swenson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-05-19· cited 6×
- Snyder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-03-04
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.