Nebraska Court of Appeals· 8/14/2001
State v. Mohr
Citations
- 632 N.W.2d 382
- 10 Neb. Ct. App. 442
- 2001 Neb. App. LEXIS 176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- best evidence rule applied to testimony as to value in a shoplifting case where the witness had no knowledge beyond what the price tags said, making the price tags’ contents a “controlling issue”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irwin, Sievers, Carlson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Robinson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1999-06-11· cited 116×
- State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-08-14· cited 94×
- State v. JohnsonNebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-04-11· cited 36×
- State v. YbarraNebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-05-02· cited 34×
- State v. KulaNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-08-11· cited 31×
- State v. RiegerNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-10-06· cited 26×
- State v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-10-29· cited 21×
- People v. FrancoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-02-18· cited 20×
- State v. WeikNebraska Supreme Court· 1980-05-06· cited 11×
- State v. BevelleMissouri Court of Appeals· 1975-09-02· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.