Friedman v. KAN. STATE BD. OF HEALING ARTS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where relief sought could have been provided under KJRA, injunction relief is not proper
• noting that parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction by consent, e.g., or waiver
• stating the general rule that administrative remedies must be exhausted before judicial review is permissible
• explaining an appellate court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a ruling the district court lacked jurisdiction to make in the first place
• if district court lacks jurisdiction, appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction over subject matter on appeal
• “Parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction by consent, waiver, or estoppel; a failure to object to the court’s jurisdiction does not invest the court with the requisite subject matter jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).