Skip to main content
· 11/17/1987

State v. Nail

Citations

  • 745 P.2d 415
  • 304 Or. 359
  • 1987 Ore. LEXIS 1970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting prior similar statute and concluding that the statute \makes concurrent sentences the norm and consecutive sentences the exception. It permits consecutive sentences only if the court makes [specific] findings[.]\
  • interpreting prior similar statute and concluding that the statute “makes concurrent sentences the norm and consecutive sentences the exception. It permits consecutive sentences only if the court makes [specific] findings [.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.