Supreme Court of Iowa· 2/23/1994

State v. Mann

Citations

512 N.W.2d 528
1994 WL 53913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the court “has an absolute responsibility to order a hearing sua sponte” when there are sufficient doubts about a defendant’s mental capacity
holding that the court “has an absolute responsibility to order a hearing sua sponte” when there are sufficient doubts about a defendant’s mental capacity
holding that recusal issue was “waived” when party “did not raise the issue immediately, but rather waited until the judge’s adverse decision in the postconviction case to raise it”
holding that recusal issue was “waived” when party “did not raise the issue immediately, but rather waited until the judge's adverse decision in the postconviction case to raise it”
finding that an officer’s testimony concerning the victim’s identification was not hearsay and therefore admissible
phrasing test as whether reasonable persons with knowledge of all facts would conclude the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson, Lavorato, Snell, Andreasen, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.