State v. Logan

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 2360

Syllabus

Motion for leave to file a motion for new trial evidentiary hearing clear and convincing evidence unavoidably prevented Brady material suppression of evidence newly discovered evidence. Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not err in denying defendant Logan's motion for leave to file a motion for new trial because Logan did not clearly and convincingly demonstrate that he was \unavoidably prevented\ from discovering the information within the motion to leave for motion to file a motion for new trial, either by demonstrating previous unawareness of the existence of the new evidence or by demonstrating that the prosecution suppressed the evidence pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).