State v. Conway
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1844
Syllabus
SUCCESSIVE POSTCONVICTION PETITION — DEATH SENTENCE — APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL — R.C. 2953.21(J)(1) — FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER: R.C. 2953.21(J)(1) generally provides indigent persons who have been sentenced to death with a statutory right to the appointment of counsel to litigate a postconviction petition for relief. Given the unique nature of capital proceedings, an appeal following a judgment on the merits of a postconviction motion may offer a remedy to a trial court's denial of the appointment of counsel, but not an adequate one in cases involving a death sentence. Thus, the trial court's order denying the motion for appointment of counsel of an indigent person who has been sentenced to death is a final, appealable order subject to appellate review under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4). However, because this court has previously interpreted R.C. 2953.21(J)(1) as requiring a trial court to appoint counsel only in the case of a timely-filed first petition for post-conviction relief—and in the absence of any challenge to that precedent in this case—the principles of stare decisis compel us to find the indigent defendant did not have a statutory right to the assistance of counsel to litigate his third petition for postconviction relief, despite having been sentenced to death. As such, the trial court did not err in denying his motion for appointment of counsel. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Edelstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- Webster v. Reproductive Health ServicesSupreme Court· 1989-07-03· cited 490×
- State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-10-07· cited 274×
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 161×
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court· 2001-05-23· cited 151×
- State v. CrowderOhio Supreme Court· 1991-06-12· cited 121×
- City of Rocky River v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 119×
- New Riegel Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Buehrer Group Architecture & Eng., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-07-17· cited 46×
- State v. WaddyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-11· cited 40×
- In Re D.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-04· cited 29×
- State v. BurkOhio Supreme Court· 2006-05-10· cited 20×
- LeRoy v. Allen Yurasek & MerklinOhio Supreme Court· 2006-08-23· cited 19×
- State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 2023-09-28· cited 19×
- State v. WestOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-08· cited 12×
- State v. ConwayOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-07· cited 9×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-05· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.