Skip to main content

State v. Miller

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 232

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for de novo resentencing or to correct sentence. Appellant's arguments were barred by res judicata, his sentence was not void, and the trial court was not the appropriate forum to challenge the Department of Rehabilitation and Correction's calculation of the expiration date of his maximum indefinite sentence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Froelich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.