Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 1801

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's motion to vacate judgment based on appellant's argument that the Ohio Bureau of Sentence Computation (BSC) miscalculated his sentence. The trial court had no authority to address the BSC's sentence calculation, and the motion to vacate was not the proper way to challenge the calculation. The trial court also did not err by overruling appellant's motion to subpoena records from the BSC. Because the trial court's jurisdiction was not properly invoked, appellant had no right to have documents subpoenaed. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.