State v. Johnson
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 1801
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's motion to vacate judgment based on appellant's argument that the Ohio Bureau of Sentence Computation (BSC) miscalculated his sentence. The trial court had no authority to address the BSC's sentence calculation, and the motion to vacate was not the proper way to challenge the calculation. The trial court also did not err by overruling appellant's motion to subpoena records from the BSC. Because the trial court's jurisdiction was not properly invoked, appellant had no right to have documents subpoenaed. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. Moore (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-16· cited 17×
- Jones v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-18· cited 7×
- State v. ArmstrongOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-19· cited 5×
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Bur. of Sentence ComputationOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-25· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.