State v. Miller

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 478

Syllabus

Appellant's claim that his guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered because the trial court failed to inform him at the plea hearing that the court could proceed with judgment and sentence upon accepting his guilty plea lacks merit. The record indicates that the trial court substantially complied with this non-constitutional advisement given that said advisement was contained in the plea form, which Appellant indicated he read and understood before signing. Appellant's claim that his plea was invalid because the trial court failed to advise him of the consequences for violating the conditions of ILC also lacks merit, as Crim.R. 11 requires no such advisement. Affirmed.