Skip to main content

State v. Ashley

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 5007

Syllabus

On appeal from his conviction for having weapons while under disability, appellant argued that his guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made. The record refutes appellant's claim that his understanding \may\ have been impaired by his use of prescribed psychotropic medications at the time of his plea, as well as his contention that he did not fully comprehend the nature of the proceedings due to a \breakdown in communication\ with his trial attorney. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Froelich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.