Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/3/2020

State v. Jones

Citations

2020 Ohio 3919

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's guilty pleas were not unknowing, unintelligent, or involuntary. The trial court did not err by not merging defendant-appellant's rape and importuning convictions.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Specifically, the written-plea agreement reflects that Jones acknowledged that “[b]y pleading, [he] admit[s] the truth of the facts and circumstances alleged[.]”
“Specifically, the written-plea agreement reflects that Jones acknowledged that “[b]y pleading, [he] admit[s] the truth of the facts and circumstances alleged[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.