State v. Michael R.
Citations
- 346 Conn. 432
Syllabus
Convicted, after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree, risk of injury to a child, employing a minor in an obscene performance, assault in the third degree, criminal violation of a protective order, and stalking in the first degree in three cases that were consolidated for trial, the defendant appealed to this court. The defendant had been romantically involved with R, and his conviction arose from his alleged abuse of R's daughter, G. On numerous occasions, the defendant sexually assaulted G during her weekly sleepovers at the defendant's house. He also gave G a cell phone and implemented certain rules, including one requiring G to send him daily ''selfies'' and one prohibiting G from letting R see the phone. At the end of one of G's visits to the defendant's house, the police responded to a complaint that the defendant had refused to return G to R. After a subsequent visit, R reported to the police that G had returned from the defendant's house with a bruise on her buttocks, and G told her pediatrician that she had been struck with a belt numerous times. Concerned about certain content that R had found on G's cell phone, R gave it to the police. An extraction of the phone's data revealed various suggestive photographs and text messages between the defen- dant and G, including photographs of the defendant lying shirtless in bed with G, text messages from the defendant instructing G to send him photographs of G fully and partially nude in various poses, along with the resulting photographs, and text messages in which the defendant discussed his plans for punishing G for failing to send him daily selfies. Thereafter, the trial court issued a protective order prohibiting the defen- dant from, among other things, following or stalking G. On a subsequent morning, however, the defendant positioned himself on a bench near G's school and made eye contact with her as she passed by in her school In accordance with our policy of protecting the privacy interests
Judges: Robinson; McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Ecker; Alexander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 1,514×
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court· 2002-04-16· cited 1,129×
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 393×
- California v. TybergSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 383×
- United States v. DostS.D. California· 1986-06-12· cited 359×
- United States v. Edwin E. WiegandNinth Circuit· 1987-03-18· cited 269×
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-11· cited 186×
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-01-24· cited 144×
- State v. PickeringSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-03-04· cited 123×
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-09-26· cited 122×
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-06-20· cited 120×
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-17· cited 112×
- Fagan v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 108×
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 104×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.