Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 7/9/2002
State v. Meyer
Citations
- 646 N.W.2d 900
- 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 808
- 2002 WL 1461629
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, for purposes of section 609.195(b), “selling” includes manufacturing a controlled substance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shumaker, Willis, Foley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-13· cited 254×
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-10-11· cited 141×
- State v. ZacherSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-08-20· cited 43×
- State v. BundeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-12-10· cited 16×
- State v. CarithersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-10-16· cited 15×
- Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-12-04· cited 11×
- State v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-05-22· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.