Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 4/8/2008
State v. Soukup
Citations
- 746 N.W.2d 918
- 2008 Minn. App. LEXIS 42
- 2008 WL 962636
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a law violates the ex post facto clause “by punishing as a crime an act previously committed, which was not a crime at the time”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lansing, Ross, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-31· cited 55×
- State v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-03-19· cited 36×
- Hankerson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-10-26· cited 35×
- State v. McLeodSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-11-17· cited 23×
- Harrison Ex Rel. Harrison v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-06-21· cited 18×
- State v. DanielskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-04-24· cited 17×
- State v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-04-17· cited 15×
- State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-12-06· cited 11×
- State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-07-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.