Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 4/17/2007
State v. Richmond
Citations
- 730 N.W.2d 62
- 2007 Minn. App. LEXIS 48
- 2007 WL 1121721
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- cautioning that it is not for the appellate courts to “fix” a statutory scheme by adding or removing language (citing State v. Anderson, 280 Minn. 461, 462, 159 N.W.2d 892, 894 (1968
- \A facially neutral statute can violate the guarantee of equal protection if it is applied in a way that makes distinctions between sim\ilarly situated people without a legitimate government interest.”
- “A facially neutral statute can violate the guarantee of equal protection if it is applied in a way that makes distinctions between similarly situated people without a legitimate government interest.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Halbrooks, Kalitowski, Collins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Davis v. City of Detroit Financial Review TeamMichigan Court of Appeals· 2012-05-21· cited 47×
- State v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-06-26· cited 9×
- United States v. Maurice OwenEighth Circuit· 2022-10-19· cited 9×
- Dean v. City of WinonaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-02-24· cited 7×
- State v. NMN WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-03-17· cited 3×
- Danna Rochelle Back v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-07-18· cited 3×
- In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROGCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-12-12· cited 3×
- State v. MaylCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-08-26· cited 3×
- State v. SoukupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-04-08· cited 2×
- State v. PriggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-07-31
- State of Minnesota v. Eloisa Rubi PlancarteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-02-05
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,568×
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court· 1923-01-02· cited 498×
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-08-24· cited 367×
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-12-13· cited 143×
- United States v. Michael Monroe Bass, United States of America v. Charles Earl PriceEighth Circuit· 1986-07-01· cited 77×
- McCannel v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-09-05· cited 76×
- State v. BehlSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-05-29· cited 66×
- State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-31· cited 55×
- In Re Senty-HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-20· cited 47×
- Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-08-03· cited 41×
- Fedziuk v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-05-19· cited 38×
- State v. WittSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-09-03· cited 38×
- State v. FrazierSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-29· cited 36×
- State v. VailSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-01-12· cited 34×
- State v. BenniefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-04-22· cited 31×
- State v. KalvigSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-06-22· cited 18×
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-04-27· cited 18×
- State v. ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-11· cited 16×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-06-21· cited 15×
- R.B. v. C.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-08-29· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.