Skip to main content

State v. Merrill

Citations

  • 309 Or. App. 68
  • 481 P.3d 441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that merger is precluded when it “is possible to prove the elements of an [offense], without also and necessarily proving all elements of” another offense (emphasis in original)
  • explaining that merger is precluded when it “is possible to prove the elements of an [offense], without also and necessarily proving all elements of” another offense (emphasis in original)
  • declining to withdraw prior opinion where court reversed convictions and remanded for a new trial, and the opinion addressed merger of the reversed counts, which could arise again on remand
  • “Even when a disposi- tion obviates the need to address an assignment of error, we may nevertheless address questions of law that may still be at issue after the case is remanded.”
  • “Even when a disposition obviates the need to address an assignment of error, we may nevertheless Cite as 311 Or App 322 (2021) 325 address questions of law that may still be at issue after the case is remanded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.