Skip to main content
· 3/8/2000

State v. McFeron

Citations

  • 999 P.2d 470
  • 166 Or. App. 110
  • 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing propriety of jury instruction concerning ways in which state may prove intox- ication because it was likely to arise on remand
  • addressing propriety of jury instruction concerning ways in which state may prove intoxication because it was likely to arise on remand
  • address- ing propriety of jury instruction concerning ways in which state may prove intoxication because it was likely to arise on remand
  • evidence about the combined effect of narcotics and alcohol was not relevant in DUII prosecution where state did not plead controlled substance DUII pursuant to ORS 813.010(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Haselton, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.