Westwood Construction Co. v. Hallmark Inns & Resorts, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing ruling concerning the availability of certain type of attorney fees under ORS 87.060 as likely to arise on remand
• addressing ruling concern- ing the availability of certain type of attorney fees under ORS 87.060 as likely to arise on remand
• addressing ruling concerning the availability of certain type of attorney fees under ORS 87.060 as likely to arise on remand
• addressing ruling concerning availability of cer- tain type of attorney fees under ORS 87.060 as likely to arise on remand
• applying statutory issue preclusion and explaining that, where it is clear from the face of a judgment or order that a matter was actually determined in a prior case, it can be preclusive under ORS 43.160 even if not strictly “essential” to the tribunal’s decision
• “issue preclusion does not bar relitigation of an issue common to separate claims when those claims are litigated as part of a single action or lawsuit” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).