New Mexico Court of Appeals· 11/8/1984
State v. Melton
Citations
- 692 P.2d 45
- 102 N.M. 120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no error where dictionary definitions did not vary from usual ordinary meanings of words or from meanings contained in trial court’s instructions
- while Rule 606(B) effectively precludes defendant from showing the affect on verdict of improper communication to jury, presumption that improper communication amounts to prejudice satisfies the requirements of due process
- jurors’ consideration of dictionary definitions which did not vary from the usual ordinary meaning of those words, or from the meaning contained in the trial court’s instructions did not prejudice the defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bivins, Wood, Hendley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-04-17· cited 71×
- People v. MessengerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-04-09· cited 63×
- State v. MannNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-01-11· cited 60×
- Kilgore v. FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-05-29· cited 57×
- Drew Ryser v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-11-25· cited 55×
- Gallegos Ex Rel. Gallegos v. Southwest Community Health ServicesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-03-08· cited 54×
- State v. SacomanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-09-27· cited 25×
- State v. PierceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 22×
- Goodloe v. BookoutNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-02-17· cited 22×
- Empire West Companies, Inc. v. Albuquerque Testing Laboratories, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-10-29· cited 22×
- Rutland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2011-03-17· cited 17×
- Eberline Instrument Corp. v. FelixNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-10-31· cited 16×
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-09-09· cited 15×
- Prudencio Ex Rel. Estate of Prudencio v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-10-07· cited 12×
- Hurst v. Citadel, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-08· cited 10×
- State v. TuftsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2016-06-02· cited 9×
- Lamkin v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-05-21· cited 4×
- State v. TuftsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-06-19· cited 4×
- Loni Marie Rutland v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-08-24
- State v. TuftsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-04-07
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-03-08· cited 1,718×
- United States v. Edwin Duncan, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1979-05-10· cited 141×
- Little v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1934-11-20· cited 102×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1967-10-27· cited 64×
- State v. BealNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1944-02-14· cited 44×
- Alvarez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-11-15· cited 42×
- State v. MossNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-07-30· cited 40×
- State v. Ho'oNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-10-14· cited 28×
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-04-24· cited 27×
- State v. HortonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1953-06-12· cited 26×
- Gertz v. BassAppellate Court of Illinois· 1965-05-10· cited 23×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-12-11· cited 14×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-06-20· cited 13×
- Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-10-19· cited 9×
- Holland v. LevineNew York Supreme Court· 1963-05-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.