State v. Medford

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 4800

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction, following a jury trial, on two counts of felonious assault and one count of improperly handling a firearm was supported by sufficient evidence, and it was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not commit plain error by admitting the expert testimony of a firearms examiner. The record does not establish ineffective assistance of counsel. Finally, since no error has been found, appellant was not prejudiced as a result of the cumulative effect of the asserted errors. Judgment affirmed.