Court of Appeals of Washington· 6/10/2003
State v. McReynolds
Citations
- 117 Wash. App. 309
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that possession and retention of stolen property is a course of conduct, while receiving, concealing, and disposing are identifiably discrete acts
- holding that possession and retention of stolen property is a course of conduct, while receiving, concealing, and disposing are identifiably discrete acts
- holding that RCW 9.41.040(6) \clearly and unambiguously prohibits concurrent sentences for the listed firearms crimes\
- finding that certain facts supported the trial court’s finding of attenuation but others did not, and remanding to the trial court for new findings and conclusions of law
- finding that certain facts supported the trial court's finding of attenuation but others did not, and remanding to the trial court for new findings and conclusions of law
- finding that RCW 9.41.040(6) unambiguously requires consecutive sentences for each count of conviction for the firearm crimes specified in the statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kato
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. OseWashington Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 70×
- In Re ShaleWashington Supreme Court· 2007-05-24· cited 55×
- In re the Personal Restraint of ShaleWashington Supreme Court· 2007-05-24· cited 54×
- State v. McReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-06-10· cited 33×
- State v. IBARRA-CISNEROSWashington Supreme Court· 2011-10-20· cited 21×
- State v. PolkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-04-28· cited 17×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-12-06· cited 16×
- State v. KenyonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-06-16· cited 14×
- State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-12-23· cited 8×
- State v. MataCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-03-18· cited 8×
- State of Washington v. Christopher R. MorrellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-03-09· cited 2×
- State of Washington v. Joe Anthony MataCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-03-18
- State of Washington v. David Norman PolkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-04-28
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 2017-08-03
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-05-09· cited 1,300×
- United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court· 1952-12-22· cited 657×
- State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 461×
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 352×
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court· 1982-02-18· cited 340×
- In Re SnowSupreme Court· 1887-01-24· cited 297×
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court· 1997-08-21· cited 290×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 271×
- State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court· 1998-10-15· cited 263×
- State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 252×
- State v. PartinWashington Supreme Court· 1977-08-18· cited 222×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1991-08-15· cited 207×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.