In Re Shale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plea agreement involving multiple charges was indivisible when, although the individual pleas were described in different documents, they were for crimes committed at the same time, were signed on the same day, and referred to one another
• holding that the defendant could not challenge his offender score because he “failed to ask the court to make a discretionary call of any factual dispute regarding the issue of ‘same criminal conduct’ and he did not contest the issue at the trial level”
• reviewing police reports incorporated by Shale in his guilty plea to determine factual basis for charges
• reviewing police reports incorporated by Shale in his guilty plea to determine factual basis for charges
• adopting our reasoning in Nitsch and holding that waiver may apply where a defendant argues for the first time on appeal that two prior convictions constituted the same criminal conduct
• noting the Goodwin court clarified that “waiver can be found where the alleged error involves an agreement to facts, later disputed, or where the alleged error involves a matter of trial court discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).