Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/9/1982

State v. McKinney

Citations

292 S.E.2d 598
278 S.C. 107
1982 S.C. LEXIS 362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that absent a timely objection during the guilty plea proceeding, the unknowing, involuntary, or unintelligent nature of a guilty plea cannot be raised on direct appeal, but must instead be addressed through the more appropriate channel of post-conviction relief
holding absent timely objection at plea proceeding, unknowing and involuntary nature of guilty plea can be attacked only through post-conviction relief
stating that absent timely objection at a plea proceeding, the sufficiency of a guilty plea can be attacked only through the more appropriate channel of post-conviction relief
holding the unknowing and involuntary nature of a guilty plea cannot be attacked on direct appeal absent a timely objection on this basis at the plea proceeding
stating that absent timely objection at plea proceeding, unknowing and involuntary nature of guilty plea can be attacked only through the more appropriate channel of post-conviction relief
stating that absent a timely objection at a plea proceeding, the sufficiency of a guilty plea can be attacked only through the more appropriate channel of post-conviction relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.