Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 6/26/2000
State v. Thomason
Citations
- 534 S.E.2d 708
- 341 S.C. 524
- 2000 S.C. App. LEXIS 120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that where an appellant seeks to reopen a guilty plea proceeding, the inquiry is generally confined to whether the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered
- holding defendant waived his double jeopardy claims by pleading guilty
- finding a guilty plea admits all elements of the offense charged, leaves open for review only the sufficiency of the indictment, and waives all other defenses
- double jeopardy claim not evident from factual allegations of indictment and record waived by guilty plea
- A guilty plea generally acts as a waiver of all non-jurisdictional defects and defenses.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morehead, Hearn, Stilwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 1,790×
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 1,036×
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-06-09· cited 61×
- State v. TruesdaleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-10-19· cited 31×
- State v. MunschSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-12-10· cited 12×
- Kelly v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-05-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.