Skip to main content
· 10/28/1996

In the Interest of Antonio H.

Citations

  • 477 S.E.2d 713
  • 324 S.C. 120
  • 1996 S.C. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the issue \whether the trial court erred in failing to make a determination of the minor's competency to enter his guilty plea\ was procedurally barred because the minor defendant did not raise it at the time of the plea
  • holding the issue of \whether the trial court erred in failing to make a determination of the minor's competency to enter his guilty plea\ was procedurally barred because the minor defendant did not raise it at the time of the plea
  • \The proper avenue in which to challenge a guilty plea which is not objected to at the time of its entry is through [PCR].\
  • proper avenue in which to challenge guilty plea which is not objected to at time of its entry is through post-conviction relief
  • proper avenue in which to challenge guilty plea which is not objected to at time of its entry is through post-conviction relief
  • appellate court may not address issue which was not presented to it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.