Supreme Court of Vermont· 10/3/1972
State v. McGrath
Citations
- 296 A.2d 636
- 130 Vt. 400
- 1972 Vt. LEXIS 290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- judicial admission must, be “unequivocal concession” of fact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keyser, Shangraw, Barney, Smith, Key, Daley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KasperSupreme Court of Vermont· 1979-04-05· cited 63×
- Matter of StarcherWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1998-01-23· cited 22×
- Trotier v. BassettSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-08-20· cited 6×
- State v. MoffittSupreme Court of Vermont· 1975-06-03· cited 4×
- In re PernickaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-04-06· cited 2×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1904-05-31· cited 260×
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Vermont· 1969-04-01· cited 82×
- State v. WordenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1878-10-15· cited 34×
- State v. BallSupreme Court of Vermont· 1962-03-07· cited 27×
- State v. MuzzySupreme Court of Vermont· 1964-06-24· cited 26×
- State v. HeddingSupreme Court of Vermont· 1961-07-12· cited 20×
- State v. DellveneriSupreme Court of Vermont· 1969-10-07· cited 18×
- McGarry v. CostelloSupreme Court of Vermont· 1969-12-02· cited 15×
- State v. LaplacaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1966-12-06· cited 12×
- Johnson v. OrrThird Circuit· 1990-03-01· cited 9×
- State v. LadaboucheSupreme Court of Vermont· 1968-04-02· cited 7×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont· 1954-01-05· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.