Supreme Court· 5/31/1904

Schick v. United States

Citations

195 U.S. 65
24 S. Ct. 826
49 L. Ed. 99
1904 U.S. LEXIS 819

Syllabus

<p>A written waiver of a jury by a defendant in an action brought by the United States to recover a penalty of fifty dollars under .§ 11 of the act of 1886 as amended by .the act of May 9, 1902, is not in conflict with the laws and constitution of the United States, and does not invalidate the judgment.</p> <p>McCray v. United States, ante, p. 27, followed as to constitutionality of the oleomargarine legislation.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

24 Stat. at Law 209, Chap. 840, U. S. C. Title 26, No. 571

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer, Harlan, Brown, Peckham, McCray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

180 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Schick v. United States

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.