Skip to main content

State v. McCurry

Citations

  • 544 N.W.2d 444
  • 1996 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 39
  • 1996 WL 68034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district court did not err in admitting reports that “were merely cumulative of evidence already in the record”
  • holding district court did not err in admitting reports that “were merely cumulative of evidence already in the record”
  • admitting a DNA report but noting the witness testimony mirrored the contents of that report so any error was harmless
  • discussing reasoning behind rule 5.803(8)(B) exceptions to the admissibility of public records and reports in criminal cases
  • holding DNA reports were hearsay
  • even though counsel filed an untimely evidentiary motion, there was no breach of professional duty where counsel nonetheless secured a ruling on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Carter, Lavorato, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.