Supreme Court of Iowa· 2/17/2006

State v. Duncan

Citations

710 N.W.2d 34
2006 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 22
2006 WL 358232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding admission of bad acts is not prejudicial where the same evidence was central to the defense trial strategy
stating that preclusion of inconsistent positions is a “common sense rule, designed to protect the integrity of the judicial process” that can be raised by the court on its own motion
stating that “preclusion of inconsistent positions” prevents “[a] party who has ... assumed a particular position in judicial proceedings” from assuming “a position inconsistent therewith to the prejudice of the adverse party”
providing a party with knowledge of the facts is precluded from taking inconsistent positions in judicial proceedings to the prejudice of the adverse party
noting on an issue of prosecutorial misconduct that “[b]ecause no such objection was made to this testimony, the claimed error was not preserved”
noting on an issue of prosecutorial misconduct, “[b]ecause no such objection was made to this testimony, the claimed error was not preserved”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavorato

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.