Skip to main content

State v. Duke

Citations

  • 892 P.2d 120
  • 77 Wash. App. 532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding defendant's court-martial was not comparable to any Washington offense, thereby precluding its consideration under RCW 9.94A.360
  • deciding defendant’s court-martial was not comparable to any Washington offense, thereby precluding its consideration under RCW 9.94A.360
  • Washington court \may look at the facts alleged in the indictment or information to determine the comparable Washington offense.\
  • Washington court “may look at the facts alleged in the indictment or information to determine the comparable Washington offense.”
  • implying in dicta that courts-martial are a part of a defendant's criminal history
  • implying in dicta that courts-martial are a part of a defendant’s criminal history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Munson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.