Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/9/2005
State v. Decker
Citations
- 127 Wash. App. 427
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that crimes that are defined to require specific conduct causing a specified result require a showing of proximate cause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Appelwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-06-07· cited 27×
- State v. SSYCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-05-27· cited 4×
- State v. S.S.Y.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-05-27· cited 4×
- State v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-03-08· cited 2×
- State Of Washington, V Douglas L. BauerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-03-08
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court· 2005-02-10· cited 252×
- State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court· 2004-03-18· cited 246×
- State v. McCorkleWashington Supreme Court· 1999-03-11· cited 94×
- State v. RivasWashington Supreme Court· 1995-06-01· cited 72×
- State v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-10-17· cited 59×
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-01-12· cited 50×
- State v. RoggenkampCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-03· cited 38×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-01-14· cited 34×
- State v. SoutherCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-05-01· cited 27×
- State v. GanttCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-07-26· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.