Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/22/2015

State v. Dickey

Citations

301 Kan. 1018
350 P.3d 1054
2015 Kan. LEXIS 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an Apprendi-based challenge meets the definition of an illegal sentence when the challenge relates to the classification of prior convictions
holding that a defendant does not have to object to his/her criminal history score at sentencing in order to later challenge it
holding that pre-KSGA Kansas burglary convictions must be scored as nonperson felonies for criminal history purposes because statute at the time made no distinction between burglary of a dwelling or nondwelling
holding pre-KSGA convictions and juvenile adjudications of burglary under K.S.A. 21- 3715 must be classified as nonperson felonies
noting that if the criminal-history score is incorrect, the defendant's sentence is necessarily illegal because it does not comply with applicable statutory provisions for sentencing
holding offense-specific provision for classifying prior crime violated Apprendi by requiring judicial factfinding as to circumstances of prior offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Dickey

21 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.