Skip to main content

State v. Maupin

Citations

  • 128 Wash. 2d 918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “a witness’s proffered testimony [may be] so incredible that its exclusion is harmless error,” but such a determination must be made “from the record”
  • recognizing both state and federal constitutional rights to present witnesses
  • treating failure by the court to allow Maupin to call a witness as constitutional error
  • motive alone or coupled with threats of such other person is inadmissible, unless coupled with other evidence tending to connect such other person with the actual commission of the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Talmadge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.