Washington Supreme Court· 4/4/1996
State v. Maupin
Citations
- 128 Wash. 2d 918
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “a witness’s proffered testimony [may be] so incredible that its exclusion is harmless error,” but such a determination must be made “from the record”
- recognizing both state and federal constitutional rights to present witnesses
- treating failure by the court to allow Maupin to call a witness as constitutional error
- motive alone or coupled with threats of such other person is inadmissible, unless coupled with other evidence tending to connect such other person with the actual commission of the crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Talmadge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 973×
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 921×
- State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court· 2006-04-13· cited 366×
- State v. SublettWashington Supreme Court· 2012-11-21· cited 310×
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court· 2007-08-30· cited 181×
- State v. AtsbehaWashington Supreme Court· 2001-02-01· cited 174×
- State v. CheatamWashington Supreme Court· 2003-12-11· cited 160×
- State v. DowningWashington Supreme Court· 2004-04-15· cited 152×
- State v. RafayCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-18· cited 125×
- State v. CoristineWashington Supreme Court· 2013-05-09· cited 106×
- In re the Personal Restraint of MorrisWashington Supreme Court· 2012-11-21· cited 100×
- State v. MaupinWashington Supreme Court· 1996-04-04· cited 92×
- State v. LuiWashington Supreme Court· 2014-01-02· cited 92×
- State v. EllisWashington Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 86×
- State v. Perez-ValdezWashington Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 85×
- State v. FranklinWashington Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 69×
- State v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-03-30· cited 60×
- Jerry Bartlett JONES, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Respondent-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 2000-03-10· cited 51×
- State v. R.H.S.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-03-01· cited 38×
- State v. StrizheusCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-09-19· cited 35×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 1,180×
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 1994-10-13· cited 831×
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court· 1985-09-05· cited 721×
- State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 461×
- Walker v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 387×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-10· cited 352×
- State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court· 1986-04-24· cited 348×
- State v. HudlowWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-24· cited 308×
- Victor Harry Feguer v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1962-04-16· cited 205×
- State v. BurriWashington Supreme Court· 1976-05-27· cited 101×
- Sloan v. Amherst County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 75×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1984-02-02· cited 68×
- State v. MaupinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-01-23· cited 39×
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-07-10· cited 34×
- Zillah Feed Yards, Inc. v. CarlisleWashington Supreme Court· 1967-10-19· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.