Skip to main content

State v. Maupin

Citations

  • 913 P.2d 808

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “a witness’s proffered testimony [may be] so incredible that its exclusion is harmless error,” but such a determination must be made “from the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Talmadge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.