Skip to main content

State v. Matthews

Citations

  • 951 A.2d 155
  • 157 N.H. 415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a rule was “a remnant of an abandoned doctrine,” in part, because it was “inconsistent with . . . our current jurisprudence”
  • overruling prior holdings due to evolution of case law from other jurisdictions
  • overruling prior holdings due to evolution of our case law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hicks, Broderick, Dalianis, Duggan, Galway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.