State v. MacElman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that vagueness may invalidate a statute for either of two independent reasons: (1) it fails to provide people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits; or (2
• explaining that vagueness may invalidate a statute for either of two independent reasons: (1) it fails to provide people of ordinary 6 intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits; or (2
• rejecting defendant’s as-applied vagueness challenge where the charged conduct was “clearly within the realm of conduct proscribed by the statute”
• explaining that we review questions of constitutional law de novo
• describing the defendant’s as-applied vagueness challenge as requiring the court to “determine whether the statute provided her with a reasonable opportunity to know that her particular conduct was proscribed by the statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).