Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2/12/2015
Doe v. State
Citations
- 167 N.H. 382
- 111 A.3d 1077
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the New Hampshire Constitution and the United States Constitution “afford the same protection against ex post facto laws”
- concluding aggregate effects of amendments to previously constitutional regulatory scheme, in particular lifetime registration without review, made the legislation punitive
- concluding aggregate effects of amendments to previously constitutional regulatory scheme, in particular lifetime registration without review, made the legislation punitive
- stating that \[a] number of courts give greatest weight\ to the factor that asks whether the law \appears excessive in relation to the alternative purpose assigned\ (citations omitted)
- observing that “[t]he protection afforded against ex post facto penal laws under both article I, section 10 of the Federal Constitution and part I, article 28 of the New Hampshire Constitution is the same” (quotation omitted)
- revisiting the statute in light of changes making it punitive, including requirement for quarterly in-person registration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conboy, Dalianis, Hicks, Lynn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-19· cited 899×
- John Does v. Richard SnyderSixth Circuit· 2016-09-15· cited 182×
- Does v. Lawrence WasdenNinth Circuit· 2020-12-09· cited 21×
- Officer John Gantert v. City of Rochester & ASupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-03-18· cited 14×
- In re G.H.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-08-06· cited 13×
- John Doe v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court· 2019-06-14· cited 13×
- Millard v. RankinD. Colorado· 2017-08-31· cited 13×
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, IN the INTEREST OF T.B., Respondent/Cross-PetitionerSupreme Court of Colorado· 2021-06-28· cited 12×
- State v. R. HinmanMontana Supreme Court· 2023-06-14· cited 6×
- State v. Jason CzekalskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2017-04-11· cited 5×
- People v. KochevarAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-11-19· cited 5×
- David Clark v. Paul O'ConnellNinth Circuit· 2016-09-02· cited 4×
- State v. Bailey P. SerpaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2018-05-24· cited 2×
- Edward White v. State of New HampshireSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2018-09-18· cited 2×
- Peo in Int of C.M.DColorado Court of Appeals· 2018-12-13· cited 2×
- State Of Washington v. Jayson Lee BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-12-11
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. PAUL TIMMENDEQUAS (15-11-1377, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2019-07-22
- IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT G.H. IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT G.A. (ML-00200521, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE, AND ML-07130018, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-08-06
- State of Iowa v. Chad Richard ChapmanSupreme Court of Iowa· 2020-06-19
- Powell v. KeelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2021-06-09
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 2,208×
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 1,492×
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,410×
- United States v. WardSupreme Court· 1980-08-22· cited 969×
- Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-06-15· cited 785×
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-12-12· cited 762×
- Regan v. Time, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 510×
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 487×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2011-07-13· cited 406×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1996-04-12· cited 365×
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 186×
- Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2013-06-25· cited 125×
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2008-07-25· cited 114×
- United States v. ParksFirst Circuit· 2012-10-16· cited 98×
- State v. LetalienSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2009-12-22· cited 79×
- Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-04· cited 77×
- John Doe I, Jane Doe, and John Doe II v. Ronald O. Otte and Bruce M. Amended BotelhoNinth Circuit· 2001-08-08· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. BakerKentucky Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 63×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.