Skip to main content

State v. Matias

Citations

  • 451 P.2d 257
  • 51 Haw. 62
  • 1969 Haw. LEXIS 82

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an individual’s constitutional right to privacy cannot be waived by another unless he or she has authorized that other person to do so
  • holding that the defendant’s “constitutional right to privacy cannot be waived by another unless he has authorized another to do so”
  • holding that an individual’s constitutional right to privacy “cannot be waived by another” unless the individual has “authorized another to do so”
  • relying on Mancusi for the proposition that the defendant was not required to hold title to the place searched in order to challenge the search of the bedroom he had occupied as an overnight guest
  • wife’s consent to search house valid despite defendant-husband’s objection to the search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, C.J., Marumoto, Abe and Levinson, Jj., and Circuit Judge Wong Assigned by Reason of Vacancy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.