State v. Delmondo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the court made an affirmative finding that the defendant was a repeat offender, it \was duty bound to impose a mandatory minimum sentence\ (emphasis added)
• holding that where the court made an affirmative finding that the defendant was a repeat offender, it “ivas duty bound to impose a mandatory minimum sentence ” (emphasis added)
• holding trial court had duty to impose mandatory minimum sentence upon defendant as a repeat offender when that fact was made evident to the court following initial sentencing
• noting when a sentence imposed does not comply with statutory requirements, the sentence is illegal
• “If [the defendant] is found to be a repeat offender, the sentencing court is bound to impose the applicable mandatory minimum term of imprisonment.”
• There may be circumstances under which it may violate due process to correct even an illegal sentence.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).