Washington Supreme Court· 10/11/1984

State v. Jackson

Citations

689 P.2d 76
102 Wash. 2d 689
1984 Wash. LEXIS 1932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the “balancing of probative value versus prejudice should be done on the record” in the context of ER 403 in relation to ER 404(b)
requiring the court to identify the purpose for admitting evidence and balance prejudice on the record before admitting the evidence under ER 404(b)
requiring the court to identify the purpose for admitting evidence and balance prejudice on the record before admitting the evidence under ER 404(b)
reviewing trial court’s ruling de novo where trial court did not conduct four-part analysis on the record
an error, not of constitutional magnitude, is harmless if there is a reasonable probability that absent the error the result would have been the same
an error, not of constitutional magnitude, is harmless if there is a reasonable probability that absent the error the result would have been the same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosellini, Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

85 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.