State v. Mason
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1086
Syllabus
Appellant's objection to the trial court's finding as to his lack of remorse is precluded by res judicata; this issue could have been raised on direct appeal, and our remand was limited to a different, specific issue. The trial court did not err by failing to give notice under Crim.R. 43(A)(2) of appellant's appearance for resentencing by video. Appellant waived his appearance in person during the resentencing hearing and did not object to any lack of notice. Appellant concedes that the trial court did not err in imposing court costs without considering his ability to pay. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hanseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-07-02· cited 57×
- State v. BarkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-10· cited 5×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-10-12· cited 4×
- State v. ShieldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-05· cited 4×
- State v. CarnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-08· cited 4×
- State v. WaltersOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-30· cited 3×
- State v. BuckneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-16· cited 3×
- State v. BondOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-03· cited 3×
- State v. MasonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.