Skip to main content

State v. Bond

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 3996

Syllabus

The trial court erred by proceeding with a resentencing hearing at which defendant-appellant was not represented by counsel. However, the trial court's failure to advise appellant of his appellate rights at the resentencing hearing was harmless error because he filed a timely notice of appeal and was appointed counsel to represent him on appeal. Appellant's remaining arguments are barred by res judicata because he failed to raise them in his direct appeal. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.