State v. Lovern

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the gravity of the error was substantial when “[t]he issue of the compláinant’s credibility was critical to the outcome of this case”
• the gravity of the error was substantial when \[t]he issue of the complainant's credibility was critical to the outcome of [the] case\
• for plain error analysis, competing inferences must be plausible
• for plain error analysis, competing inferences must be plausible
• for plain error analysis, competing inferences must be “plausible”
• for plain error analysis, competing inferences must be plausible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).