Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/20/2006
State v. Martinez
Citations
- 900 A.2d 485
- 278 Conn. 598
- 2006 Conn. LEXIS 209
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Connecticut is in the minority of states which do not follow the Sullivan rule
- threshold inquiry is whether “the trial court included in its instructions language ‘expressly sanctioning’ a nonunanimous verdict”
- “under the Pinkerton doctrine, a conspirator may be found guilty of a crime that he or she did not commit if the state can establish that a coconspirator did commit the crime” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- accessorial liability and conspiracy are distinct theories of criminal liability
- accessorial liability and conspiracy are distinct theories of criminal liability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Borden, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CowardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-30· cited 63×
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-01-02· cited 63×
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 35×
- State v. McCarthyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-02-05· cited 26×
- State v. SamConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-10-10· cited 24×
- State v. BrewerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-31· cited 22×
- State v. BarnwellConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-03· cited 11×
- State v. DelestreSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2012-01-12· cited 11×
- State v. MahonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-09-12· cited 11×
- State v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-03-25· cited 8×
- State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-05-29· cited 7×
- State v. VasquezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-02-28· cited 7×
- State v. LaFountainConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-04-12· cited 7×
- State v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-11-21· cited 7×
- State v. SoyiniConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-03-13· cited 5×
- State v. CorleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-01· cited 4×
- Diaz v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-08-02· cited 4×
- State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-30· cited 2×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 3,200×
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,454×
- United States v. Franklin Delano GipsonFifth Circuit· 1977-06-06· cited 381×
- People v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals· 1903-01-06· cited 204×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-01-17· cited 186×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-12-21· cited 178×
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-12· cited 157×
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 157×
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-08-20· cited 141×
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-02· cited 132×
- United States v. Charles Lidge Bolts and Joe Dee HicksFifth Circuit· 1977-08-29· cited 126×
- State v. CeballosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-21· cited 125×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-11· cited 100×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-12-20· cited 95×
- State v. VelascoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-16· cited 89×
- State v. FamigliettiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-23· cited 88×
- State v. CorreaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-06-10· cited 87×
- State v. KlingeHawaii Supreme Court· 2000-02-04· cited 86×
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-30· cited 81×
- State v. SorabellaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-02-07· cited 79×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.