Court of Appeals of Arizona· 4/20/2000

State v. Marshall

Citations

4 P.3d 1039
197 Ariz. 496
319 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 32
2000 Ariz. App. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the defendant’s lesser-included sexual conduct offense argument was rendered moot by the jury’s explicit finding that the victim was less than fifteen
explaining that “one cannot penetrate the vagina without also contacting or penetrating the vulva”
If “the legislature intended to restrict the application of the statute . . . it could have easily done so.”
“Had the legislature intended to restrict the application of the statute . . . , it could have easily done so by substituting [words other than the words chosen].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gerber, Kleinschmidt, Toci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.