State v. Marshall

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 4445

Syllabus

Appellant was not entitled to a new trial where he raises an issue for the first time on appeal. Moreover, appellant failed to establish that an unknown individual entered the jury room in violation of R.C. 2945.33. Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel based upon his trial counsel's reasonable trial strategy. Appellant's convictions are supported by sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence where there was ample testimony proving appellant was the driver of the vehicle. The state did not fail to establish the identity of the perpetrator of the offenses.