State v. Flack
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 4622
Syllabus
Appellant's burglary and safecracking convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Trial counsel was not ineffective for not requesting a jury instruction on the lesser-included offense of attempted safecracking. The trial court erred in failing to merge the offenses of safecracking and criminal damaging as allied offenses of similar import where the offenses were committed with the same conduct and the same animus and resulted in the same harm to the same victim.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 491×
- State v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court· 2009-06-30· cited 302×
- State v. GriffieOhio Supreme Court· 1996-01-17· cited 30×
- State v. BertramOhio Supreme Court· 2023-05-03· cited 29×
- State v. HarnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-26· cited 18×
- State v. Newman Paul PowihOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-14· cited 14×
- State v. ClowersOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-12· cited 13×
- State v. RichardsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-13· cited 10×
- State v. MarshallOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-09· cited 7×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-20· cited 6×
- State v. SeymoreOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-27· cited 4×
- State v. RojasOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.